Simplifying Management
Google
 

Friday, August 17, 2007

Leveraged Buy-Out:

What do you think when you hear the name Tata-Tetley. Well most of us associate it only to the morning tea that is tastier than most of the other brands available. Only a few in our country know that Tata buying Tetley was India’s first Leveraged Buy-Out or LBO as it is popularly called.

But what exactly is LBO ?

Well it’s like a small fish eating a big one. Not possible! Well in the field of merger and acquisition it is very much possible. LBO is company acquiring another one, which is of size greater than three or four times the size of the acquirer.

For example in March 2000, Tata-Tetley 300 mn pound deal, Tata tea had net worth of less than one third of the net worth of Tetley, whom it acquired.

In LBO an special purpose vehicle (SPV) is formed to carry out the deal in which, the acquirer puts small amount of equity (the capital brought in by itself) into the SPV and rest amount is raised from debt which is 3-5 times the equity. The lenders are given the assets of the company being acquired as the collateral. Thus, there is no net affect on the balance sheet of the acquiring company as the loan is taken by the SPV. Oh ! this sounds great.

After the Tata-Corus LBO, Tata steel is now the fifth largest producer of Steal. Calcine-CII carbon deal made Calcine largest producer of the calcined carbon in the world. So for the organic growth this LBO seems to be mostly used tool. However, this is not something that makes the investors very happy.

Then where is the catch?

Firstly, for the debt the interest rate is very high for LBO, sometimes as high as 8-9.5 %. This puts huge burden on the acquiring company in terms of paying interest, although, the acquiring company is not primarily responsible as the loan is taken by the SPV, but its know to everyone that if there is any default the company may have to pay by liquidating (selling) its own assets. This reduces the value of the firms in the minds of investors, which reflects in the lowering of share price of the company.

Secondly, the rating of the company goes down. After the Tata-Corus deal, the rating of Tata came down from AAA to AA. This makes the company unfavorable for investor to invest in it when the company itself needs some fund later.

Thirdly, the heavy interest payment is thought to be paid by the future cash earnings of the acquired company. For this there is a need of market. Now to find such market the company relies on international market. For example in case of Tata steal India will have to rely on market like China for generating revenue which can be used to pay those heavy interest. Now if the relation with china becomes bad, the company will turn red.

Then again the question comes in mind that if there is such a risk involve than why at all the company go abroad for the leverage buy-out when there is a option of merger?

The reasons are:

i) RBI has regulation that a domestic company can’t raise debt more than three times of the net worth of it. In case of LBO, the SPV is created outside India and it takes loan as much is needed as fall outside the purview of RBI.

ii) Merger can be an option but, cross country merger always has to deal with a lot of regulations and barriers. So the simple way out is acquire that company by floating a SPV in the country where the company being acquired is belongs.

navalkpratihast@gmail.com

8 comments:

icecool said...

luv thy style!
devoid of financial jargon and clutter,
simplicity at its best, keep it up.

M.P.Singh said...

i have doubt that if TATA is aquiring one company so its assets & market size is increasing & in case of tetlay the company was doing well then what are the reasons by which these companies rating fall down....

Funambulist's Mind said...

Its simply the coolest thing
It was a freshing and brushing effect on my mind to get all thoughts back to the 1st sem case

One simple answer to MP's question is that the rating of the acquiring company is very much dependent on the amount of debt take by the company and the size of it net worth rather than the or say less dependent on what is the current and future cash flows of the acquired company...
After the acquisition of Teltey Tata rejuvenated its most popular tazza brand that may be an input for fumbling down of Tata's overall rating...
By the a gr8 effort by the Blogger
Hats off....

Glimpse of India said...

ur article is very good, finance in its simplest version, apreciable.

Naval there are few points where i got stuck pls give some clearance on these:

1:If the companies assets are kept as collateral that means its a loan against these assets,right, so how u dont account this in the ballance sheet??

2: Who is the acquiring entity the comapny or the SPV.

3: Is the SPV seprate legal entity to take a loan & acquire?

4: Is it necessry that the acquired company should be three or four times bigger than the acquiring company? cant there be any LBO for company with same size?

5: Again, if the company is paying intrest that means it is accounted & if the debt is not accounted then where the money going.

These might b simpler questions for u but think i am a non finance guy. ;)

Naval Pratihast said...

thanx harish...MP, neil and anup!


i need this type of encouragement.

well special thanks to neil for clearing MP singh's doubt.adding to what neil has explained, the grading comes down as there his huge debt raised, albeit by the SPV, but in case of default the company holds secondary responsibility to pay back the loan and interest. now why the huge debt lowers the rating? well the debt holders are to be paid first when the company turns red. so the investor particularly the share holders will be jittery to invest in such company whom they think can not clear the debt and if at all the assets of company are sold(called liquidation) first claim will be of debtors on the liquidated assets. this reduces the credit rating

Naval Pratihast said...

i will answer to bang anups questions one by one.

U asked:If the companies assets are kept as collateral that means its a loan against these assets,right, so how u dont account this in the ballance sheet?

Ans: this is accounted, but not onthe balance sheet but on the balance sheet of the SPV. there are two component the equity and debt for the LBO. the equity is paid by the acquring company and is shown in its balance sheet as investment. where as debt is shown in the balance sheet of SPV.

U asked: Who is the acquiring entity the comapny or the SPV.
Ans: well the acuiring company is SPV,and once the due etc is paid the SPV merges with the original company.

U asked: Is the SPV seprate legal entity to take a loan & acquire?
Ans: yes.

U asked: Is it necessry that the acquired company should be three or four times bigger than the acquiring company? cant there be any LBO for company with same size?
Ans: No not at all. thnk anup why do i company take debt if it has to buy a company which is very small and company already has enough of cash. well, the small company can be bought with full equity, in that case no LBO is needed at all. this is not something unusual as even for small comapany the debt is raised as was in the case of Kingfisher-white& mackhey acuisition where the debt was taken but small amount wud not have made much difference to the balance sheet of kingfisher so they didn't go for SPV and LBO.

U asked: Again, if the company is paying interest that means it is accounted & if the debt is not accounted then where the money going.
Ans: now the loan is on SPV. from the cash flow from the profit of the business of acquired firm the loans and interest are paid. the original company comes into picture only when the loans with interest are fully paid and its time to merge the SPV . the company aquired and the acuiring company.

Anonymous said...

naval y don't you complete the tata tetley story - wht happened to tata after the LBO? which u have told me cud do some more value addition here.

Spiritualmanager said...

Hey, my comment was long due.Your understanding of the subject is admirable and I am saying it as a fan and not someone who can judge.